Pipara & Co LLP

Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements

Introduction

Scope of this SA
  1. This Standard on Auditing (SA) deals with the specific responsibilities of the auditor regarding quality control procedures for an audit of financial statements. It also addresses, where applicable, the responsibilities of the engagement quality control reviewer. This SA is to be read in conjunction with relevant ethical requirements.
System of Quality Control and Role of Engagement Teams
  1. Quality control systems, policies and procedures are the responsibility of the audit firm. Under SQC 1, the firm has an obligation to establish and maintain a system of quality control to provide it with reasonable assurance that:
  1. The firm and its personnel comply with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements; and
  2. The reports issued by the firm or engagement partners are appropriate in the circumstances1.
This SA is premised on the basis that the firm is subject to SQC 1. (Ref: Para. A1)
  1. Within the context of the firm’s system of quality control, engagement teams have a responsibility to implement quality control procedures that are applicable to the audit engagement and provide the firm with relevant information to enable the functioning of that part of the firm’s system of quality control relating to independence.
  2. Engagement teams are entitled to rely on the firm’s system of quality control, unless information provided by the firm or other parties suggests otherwise. (Ref: Para. A2)
Effective Date
This SA is effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after April 1, 2010.
Objective
  1. The objective of the auditor is to implement quality control procedures at the engagement level that provide the auditor with reasonable assurance that:

1 Standard on Quality Control (SQC) 1, “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information, and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”, paragraph 10.

  1. The audit complies with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements; and
  2. The auditor’s report issued is appropriate in the circumstances.
Definitions
  1. For purposes of the SAs, the following terms have the meanings attributed below:
  1. Engagement partner – the partner or other person in the firm who is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and is in full time practice and is responsible for the engagement and its performance, and for the report that is issued on behalf of the firm, and who, where required, has the appropriate authority from a professional, legal or regulatory body.
  2. Engagement quality control review – a process designed to provide an objective evaluation, before the report is issued, of the significant judgments the engagement team made and the conclusions they reached in formulating the report.
  3. Engagement quality control reviewer – a partner, other person2 in the firm, suitably qualified external person, or a team made up of such individuals, with sufficient and appropriate experience and authority to objectively evaluate, before the report is issued, the significant judgments the engagement team made and the conclusions they reached in formulating the report. However, in case the review is done by a team of individuals, such team should be headed by a member of the Institute.
  4. Engagement team – all personnel performing an engagement, including any experts contracted by the firm in connection with that engagement. The term “engagement team” excludes individuals within the client’s internal audit function who provide direct assistance on an audit engagement when the external auditor complies with the requirements of SA 610 (Revised).3
  5. Firm – a sole practitioner/proprietor, partnership, or any such entity of professional accountants, as may be permitted by law.
  6. Inspection – in relation to completed engagements, procedures designed to provide evidence of compliance by engagement teams with the firm’s quality control policies and procedures.
  7. 2 Such other person should be a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

3 SA 610 (Revised), Using the Work of Internal Auditors, establishes limits on the use of direct assistance. It also acknowledges that the external auditor may be prohibited by law or regulation from obtaining direct assistance from internal auditors. Therefore, the use of direct assistance is restricted to situations where it is permitted.

  1. Listed entity – an entity whose shares, stock or debt are quoted or listed on a recognized stock exchange, or are traded under the regulations of a recognized stock exchange or other equivalent body.
  2. Monitoring – a process comprising an ongoing consideration and evaluation of the firm’s system of quality control, including a periodic inspection of a selection of completed engagements, designed to enable the firm to obtain reasonable assurance that its system of quality control is operating effectively.
  3. Network firm – A firm or entity that belongs to a network.
  4. Network – A larger structure:
    1. That is aimed at cooperation, and
    2. That is clearly aimed at profit or cost-sharing or shares common ownership, control or management, common quality control policies and procedures, common business strategy, the use of a common brand name, or a significant part of professional resources.
  5. Partner – any individual with authority to bind the firm with respect to the performance of a professional services engagement.
  6. Personnel – partners and staff.
  7. Professional Standards – Engagement Standards, as defined in the “Preface to the Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services”, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and relevant ethical requirements as contained in the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute.
  8. Relevant ethical requirements – Ethical requirements to which the engagement team and engagement quality control reviewer are subject, which ordinarily comprise the Code of Ethics of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India related to an audit of financial statements.
  9. Staff – professionals, other than partners, including any experts which the firm employs.

Suitably qualified external person – an individual outside the firm with the capabilities and competence to act as an engagement partner, for example a partner or an employee4 (with appropriate experience) of another firm.

Requirements
Leadership Responsibilities for Quality on Audits
  1. The engagement partner shall take responsibility for the overall quality on each audit engagement to which that partner is assigned. (Ref: Para. A3)
Relevant Ethical Requirements
  1. Throughout the audit engagement, the engagement partner shall remain alert, through observation and making inquiries as necessary, for evidence of non-compliance with relevant ethical requirements by members of the engagement team. (Ref: Para. A4-A5)
  2. If matters come to the engagement partner’s attention through the firm’s system of quality control or otherwise that indicate that members of the engagement team have not complied with relevant ethical requirements, the engagement partner, in consultation with others in the firm, shall determine the appropriate action. (Ref: Para. A5)
Independence
  1. The engagement partner shall form a conclusion on compliance with independence requirements that apply to the audit engagement. In doing so, the engagement partner shall:
  1. Obtain relevant information from the firm and, where applicable, network firms, to identify and evaluate circumstances and relationships that create threats to independence;
  2. Evaluate information on identified breaches, if any, of the firm’s independence policies and procedures to determine whether they create a threat to independence for the audit engagement; and
  3. Take appropriate action to eliminate such threats or reduce them to an acceptable level by applying safeguards, or, if considered appropriate, to withdraw from the audit engagement, where withdrawal is permitted by law or regulation. The engagement partner shall promptly report to the firm any inability to resolve the matter for appropriate action. (Ref: Para. A5-A7)
Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationships and Audit Engagements
  1. The engagement partner shall be satisfied that appropriate procedures regarding the acceptance and continuance of client relationships and audit engagements have been followed, and shall determine that conclusions reached in this regard are appropriate. (Ref: Para. A8-A9)
  2. If the engagement partner obtains information that would have caused the firm to decline the audit engagement had that information been available earlier, the engagement partner shall communicate that information promptly to the firm, so that the firm and the engagement partner can take the necessary action. (Ref: Para. A9)
Assignment of Engagement Teams
  1. The engagement partner shall be satisfied that the engagement team, and any auditor’s experts who are not part of the engagement team, collectively have the appropriate competence and capabilities to:
  1. Perform the audit engagement in accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements; and
  2. Enable an auditor’s report that is appropriate in the circumstances to be issued. (Ref: Para. A10-A12)
Engagement Performance
Direction, Supervision and Performance
  1. The engagement partner shall take responsibility for:
  1. The direction, supervision and performance of the audit engagement in compliance with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements; and (Ref: Para. A13-A15, A20)
  2. The auditor’s report being appropriate in the circumstances.
Reviews
  1. The engagement partner shall take responsibility for reviews being performed in accordance with the firm’s review policies and procedures. (Ref: Para. A16-A17, A20)
  2. On or before the date of the auditor’s report, the engagement partner shall, through a review of the audit documentation and discussion with the engagement team, be satisfied that sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained to support the conclusions reached and for the auditor’s report to be issued. (Ref: Para. A18-A20)
Consultation
  1. The engagement partner shall:
  1. Take responsibility for the engagement team undertaking appropriate consultation on difficult or contentious matters;
  2. Be satisfied that members of the engagement team have undertaken appropriate consultation during the course of the engagement, both within
  the engagement team and between the engagement team and others at the appropriate level within or outside the firm;
  1. Be satisfied that the nature and scope of, and conclusions resulting from, such consultations are agreed with the party consulted; and
  2. Determine that conclusions resulting from such consultations have been implemented. (Ref: Para. A21-A22)
Please select any one region